BioAcyl Corp

WIKINDX Resources

Deretic, V., & Levine, B. (2018). Autophagy balances inflammation in innate immunity. Autophagy, 14(2), 243–251. 
Added by: Dr. Enrique Feoli (26/05/2023, 20:26)   Last edited by: Dr. Enrique Feoli (27/05/2023, 11:06)
Resource type: Journal Article
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1402992
BibTeX citation key: Deretic2018
View all bibliographic details
Categories: BioAcyl Corp, BioAcyl Corp
Subcategories: Autophagy and mitophagy, inflammation
Creators: Deretic, Levine
Collection: Autophagy
Views: 2/139
Abstract
ABSTRACTMacroautophagy/autophagy is a homeostatic process with multiple effects on immunity. One of the pivotal contributions of autophagy in immunity is the cell autonomous control of inflammation. This property leads to systemic consequences and thereby influences the development of innate and adaptive immunity, which promotes or suppresses pathology in various disease contexts. In this review we focus on the intersections between autophagy and inflammasome activation, autophagy and interferons, and autophagy and inflammation in association with infection.
  
Notes

Figure

Common themes in autophagic homeostasis of endomembrane damage and proinflammatory signaling. Organelles such as mitochondria (A), lysosomes (B), and phagosomes (C), can be depolarized (ΔΨm), perforated, or otherwise damaged. E3 ligases, such as PRKN/PARK2/parkin, SMURF1, etc., can ubiquitinate targets (K48, K63) on damaged organelles. The AAA-ATPase VCP/p97 can either turn over ubiquitin (K48) by recruiting deubiquitinases to permit further steps in lysosomal homeostasis, or unfold targets such as MFNs (mitofusins) on mitochondria to present them to the proteasome for degradation. K48 ubiquitin also presents phagosomal membrane to proteasomes thus contributing to membrane processing or further damage. Galectins can recognize membrane tears and bind to exposed lumenal glycans while in turn binding to receptors such as SLRs (e.g., LGALS8-CALCOCO2/NDP52), which deliver organelles to phagophores or receptor-regulators (e.g., LGALS3-TRIM16 or LGALS8-TRIM16) that function as receptors and in addition assemble and promote ubiqitination and activation of regulatory ATG factors. SLRs, or other types of receptor such as PHB2 (exposed on the inner membrane of ruptured mitochondria) or integral outer membrane receptors on mitochondria bind Atg8-family proteins (e.g., LC3) via their LC3-interacting region motifs. Damaged organelles are either removed (note crescents representing phagophores, i.e. autophagosome precursors) or otherwise repaired, and if not, they activate inflammasomes (and potentially type I IFNs) as described in the text. If bacteria are not removed along with the remnants of their vacuoles/phagosomes (e.g., via LGALS8), linear ubiquitin chains are formed to activate IKBKG/NEMO and NFKB, leading to inflammation. These processes share common principles and contribute to either suppression of pro-inflammatory responses (by repair or removal of offending organelles and bacteria) or, when they are overwhelmed or otherwise fail, elicit inflammatory cytokines as a second line of defense but at a cost due to associated tissue damage. mATG8s, mammalian Atg8-family proteins.

 

Neutrophilic infiltration in Mtb-infected Atg5fl/fl Lys2-Cre mice has been shownCitation81 to be responsible for the early lethality of such mice,Citation79,Citation80 and a neutrophil-driven transcriptional signatureCitation82 is considered to be a hallmark of active tuberculosis in humans.

Type I interferon is another signature of active disease in Mtb-infected patientsCitation82 and is considered as a potentially counterproductive host response in bacterial infections (in contrast to its usual protective role in viral infections). However, it may also act as a balancer by suppressing excessive IL1B responses.Citation83 Bacterial DNA released from phagosomes harboring Mtb and Legionella pneumophila can be recognized by CGAS to induce type I interferon, proposed to be damaging or at least counterproductive for the host during bacterial infection.Citation84 However, mb21d1/CGAS knockout mice do not survive better as one might expect, but rather succumb to disease during the chronic phase of tuberculosis infection.Citation85 Perhaps the duality of the roles for MB21D1/CGAS in inducing type I IFN responses and connecting to the core autophagy apparatusCitation86 while sensing bacterial presence and targeting the autophagic response to control intracellular bacteriaCitation84,Citation85 may result in a net protective effect of MB21D1/CGAS against Mtb infection in mice.


Added by: Dr. Enrique Feoli  Last edited by: Dr. Enrique Feoli
WIKINDX 6.12.1 | Total resources: 1701 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Time Zone: America/Costa_Rica (-06:00)