BioAcyl Corp

WIKINDX Resources  

Majdoul, S., & Compton, A. A. (2022). Lessons in self-defence: Inhibition of virus entry by intrinsic immunity. Nature Reviews Immunology, 22(6), 339–352. 
Added by: Dr. Enrique Feoli (14/04/2023, 16:28)   Last edited by: Dr. Enrique Feoli (14/04/2023, 16:33)
Resource type: Journal Article
DOI: 10.1038/s41577-021-00626-8
ID no. (ISBN etc.): 1474-1741
BibTeX citation key: Majdoul2022
View all bibliographic details
Categories: BioAcyl Corp, BioAcyl Corp
Subcategories: Constitutive innate immunity, COVID-19
Creators: Compton, Majdoul
Collection: Nature Reviews Immunology
Views: 2/176
Abstract
Virus entry, consisting of attachment to and penetration into the host target cell, is the first step of the virus life cycle and is a critical ‘do or die’ event that governs virus emergence in host populations. Most antiviral vaccines induce neutralizing antibodies that prevent virus entry into cells. However, while the prevention of virus invasion by humoral immunity is well appreciated, considerably less is known about the immune defences present within cells (known as intrinsic immunity) that interfere with virus entry. The interferon-induced transmembrane (IFITM) proteins, known for inhibiting fusion between viral and cellular membranes, were once the only factors known to restrict virus entry. However, the progressive development of genetic and pharmacological screening platforms and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic have galvanized interest in how viruses infiltrate cells and how cells defend against it. Several host factors with antiviral potential are now implicated in the regulation of virus entry, including cholesterol 25-hydroxylase (CH25H), lymphocyte antigen 6E (LY6E), nuclear receptor co-activator protein 7 (NCOA7), interferon-γ-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase (GILT), CD74 and ARFGAP with dual pleckstrin homology domain-containing protein 2 (ADAP2). This Review summarizes what is known and what remains to be understood about the intrinsic factors that form the first line of defence against virus infection.
  
Notes

The antiviral activities exhibited by nuclear receptor co-activator protein 7 (NCOA7), interferon-induced transmembrane (IFITM) proteins, interferon-γ-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase (GILT), CD74 and ARFGAP with dual pleckstrin homology domain-containing protein 2 (ADAP2) act against viruses entering cells through pH-dependent fusion in endosomes. Whereas NCOA7 and IFITM3 have been reported to interact with vacuolar ATPase (v-ATPase), only NCOA7 may increase the acidity (lower the pH) of the endosomal lumen. NCOA7-mediated acidification of endosomes is associated with enhanced cathepsin activity in endolysosomes, and this elevated level of proteolytic activity may promote virion degradation before virus–cell fusion occurs. IFITM3, on the other hand, inhibits membrane fusion itself, resulting in endosomal sequestration of virions that are eventually degraded in endolysosomes. This latter effect results from the ability of IFITM3 to promote endolysosomal delivery of viral and cellular cargo, a function that is not yet mechanistically understood. GILT and CD74 are believed to enforce endosomal sequestration of viruses as well, but not by inhibiting membrane fusion — they inhibit the activity of endolysosomal cathepsins, proteases that cleave some viral glycoproteins and render them competent for fusion. ADAP2 promotes internalization of virions by macropinocytosis, bypassing their preferred sites for pH-dependent fusion and resulting in their accelerated disposal in endolysosomes.


Added by: Dr. Enrique Feoli  Last edited by: Dr. Enrique Feoli
WIKINDX 6.12.1 | Total resources: 1701 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Time Zone: America/Costa_Rica (-06:00)